The prior study of significant articles and research would have allowed for the reasoning of a possible deliberative dynamic within the neural realm. A mechanism that would seem to attribute the inference of a specific selection of information to a spontaneous activity. As a most remarkable reflection, we would highlight that this activity would then seem to arbitrate specific responses to particular needs, transcending the classical source of conscious thought.

In this way, both the exercise of retrospectively reflecting on the various experiences gathered across selected previous stages, as well as the analysis of the relationship between natural human creativity and the electric machine, would acquire meaning. This would lead to a discussion of both the classical, periodic linearity of experienced time and empiricism as the source of information defining the object of study.

On the other hand, the necessary arguments to debate and defend the ubiquity of value in information would also be reflected upon. A consideration that, coherently, would challenge the classical legitimacy attributed to empirical study, thereby suggesting a significant ontological crisis.

Finally, by understanding and assuming the substantial influence left by the interference of electric automation in the definition of the object of study, progress will be made toward reflections that would raise the necessary and useful criteria for confirming veracity and legitimacy. This allows for the enrichment of the purpose of NFT archives, specifically suggesting the utility they would provide in the practice of hybridity.